Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Lee JE, Park HJ, Lee SY et al (2017) Interreader reliability and clinical validity of a magnetic resonance imaging grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis. Ĭaridi JM, Pumberger M, Hughes AP (2011) Cervical radiculopathy: a review. Tumialán LM, Ponton RP, Gluf WM (2010) Management of unilateral cervical radiculopathy in the military: the cost effectiveness of posterior cervical foraminotomy compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Oblique fine cut images derived from three dimensional MRI datasets may yield more consistency, better clinical correlation, enhanced surgical decision-making and outcomes.Īlvin MD, Lubelski D, Abdullah KG et al (2016) Cost-utility analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating (ACDFP) versus posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) for patients with single-level cervical radiculopathy at 1-year follow-up. Clinical application of these scoring systems is limited by their reliance on nonstandard imaging (Park), limited validation against clinical symptoms and surgical outcome data. The Park, Kim and Modified Kim systems for classifying the degree of stenosis of the nerve root canal have been described. Imaging of the cervical nerve root canals is mostly performed using MRI and is reported using subjective terminology. Korean J Radiol 16:1294, 2015) and (Park et al. The grading themes that came from this systematic review show that the most mature for cervical foraminal stenosis is described by (Kim et al. Most of the reports involved multiple imaging modalities with standard axial and sagittal imaging used most. A total of 6952 articles were identified with 59 included. In collaboration with the University of Leeds, a search strategy was developed.

A systematic search of Ovid Medline databases, Embase 1947 to present, Cinahl, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ISRCTN and WHO international clinical trials was performed for reports of cervical foraminal stenosis published before 01 February 2020. The importance of imaging the cervical spine using CT or MRI in evaluating cervical foraminal stenosis is widely accepted however, there is no consensus for standardized methodology to assess the compression of the cervical nerve roots. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the existing radiological grading systems that are used to assess cervical foraminal stenosis. The study design of this paper is systematic review.

Cervical spine x ray cost